Supreme Administrative Court in Poland, SAC, administrative law in Poland, vacation leave compensation, police officer, tax matters, building law, public procurement, permits and licenses, environmental protection, Constitution, SAC judgment, labor law, compensation payment, precedent case, Police Act
Attorney Joanna Susło has been building her reputation in the field of administrative law for years, and her latest success before the Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) only confirms her skills and experience in handling complex cases at the highest level of administrative justice. The victory she achieved in a case concerning the refusal to pay compensation for unused vacation leave, both regular and additional, to a police officer is a significant achievement not only for the attorney but also for her client, who, thanks to effective representation, obtained a favorable decision in a challenging and precedent-setting case.
The judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court, which dismissed the cassation complaint of the Chief of Police regarding the refusal to pay compensation for unused vacation leave, is available at the following link: effective-attorney-in-Poland-administrative-court
Compensation for unused vacation leave is a “substitute form” of taking leave in cases where discharge from service makes it legally and practically impossible to use these benefits in kind. This means that after the termination of the service relationship, the right to leave transforms into a financial benefit, which, as the name suggests, is its equivalent. The obligation to pay rests on the Police (employer), as the officer acquired these rights during their service but could not exercise them in kind due to their duties (cf. SAC judgment of February 11, 2021, reference III OSK 2794/21, LEX no. 3124964).
Considering the role of Article 66(2) of the Constitution (guaranteeing the right to rest) and its connection to the protection of workers’ health and life, the primary way to realize this right is the actual use of leave, and the only form of compensation is the monetary equivalent provided by law. The equivalent benefit for a day of unused leave is the salary for one working day (cf. also the judgment of the Krakow Administrative Court of February 16, 2021, reference III SA/Kr 1247/20, LEX no. 3120678).
Given these arguments, there is no legal basis to limit police officers’ right, including the complainant’s, to receive full, constitutionally compliant compensation for unused leave based on the date of their discharge. The administrative body should recalculate and pay the complainant’s due compensation based on Article 115a of the Police Act, interpreted in line with Article 66(2) of the Constitution, concerning the worker’s right to annual paid leave. Any other stance would contradict the principles of a democratic state of law, which embodies the principles of social justice due to the need to protect other constitutional values (cf. SAC judgment of December 3, 2014, reference II OSK 2311/14).
Most Common Administrative Cases Before the Supreme Administrative Court
The Supreme Administrative Court, being the highest instance in administrative matters, deals with highly complex legal issues. Companies and individuals appear before the SAC due to disputes with public administration bodies concerning various aspects of economic and social life. The most common administrative cases heard by administrative courts include:
CONTACT US FOR MORE INFORMATION
E-mail: [email protected]
Mobile WhatsApp 24/7: + 48 668 841 990
SOS-Legal-Law-Firm
Lawyer in Poland
Supreme Administrative Court in Poland, SAC, administrative law in Poland, vacation leave compensation, police officer, tax matters, building law, public procurement, permits and licenses, environmental protection, Constitution, SAC judgment, labor law, compensation payment, precedent case, Police Act